Skip to content
FeaturesPricingAffiliateBlogHelpAboutContact
Get StartedSign In
Back to Blog
industry2028-10-097 min read

Beambox vs thMenu Affiliate: WiFi Marketing vs Full QR Stack

Beambox's WiFi-portal affiliate vs thMenu's full menu+ordering ecosystem. How Pendik hotel-restaurant affiliate Ferhat scaled cross-sell to $2,300/month with two revenue streams.

th

thMenu Team

thmenu.com

In the lobby of a five-star hotel restaurant in Pendik, Ferhat was sticking two QR codes side by side: one for a Beambox WiFi portal, the other for thMenu's menu + ordering. Guests grabbed the WiFi password and a bilingual menu in a single move. His combined affiliate income climbed to $2,300/month. The interesting question isn't which platform wins — it's how they fit together.

Beambox's narrow specialty: WiFi portal + email capture

Beambox owns a sharply defined niche. Guests authenticate with email or phone on a branded captive portal; automated journeys fire afterward (Friday coffee discounts, birthday vouchers, lapse-recovery flows). Hotel restaurants, open-air cafes, and beach bars are ideal because one touchpoint pulls double duty — nobody scans a separate menu QR after the WiFi one.

The affiliate program pays a competitive 20-30% annual recurring rate, but unit economics are bounded by hardware: customers buy a router/AP, and installation often needs a tech. Longer sales cycle, but post-install churn is very low.

thMenu's broader surface: menu, order, WiFi share, waiter call

thMenu starts from a different hypothesis: collapse every table-side guest action — menu browsing, ordering, waiter calls, bill requests, WiFi password sharing — into one QR. Built-in WiFi credential sharing ships in Pro+; it isn't a captive portal in the Beambox sense, but it kills the "I just want the WiFi password" moment that drives table-staff interruptions.

The affiliate commission is 20% lifetime on Pro+ plans. Pro is $29/month, Platinum $59/month. Annual plans drip-release commissions across 12 months to soften refund exposure. The point isn't to displace Beambox — it's to complement it.

Cross-sell economics: Ferhat's $2,300 breakdown

Ferhat's Pendik portfolio: 18 hotel restaurants, 6 beach cafes, 4 spa+restaurant complexes. Average Beambox ACV: $80/month (router amortized in). Average thMenu ACV: $42/month (Pro-heavy mix). Instead of selling two products separately, he positions a "Guest Experience Bundle": the first meeting starts with the WiFi pain point, then table-ordering, multilingual menus, and allergen data come up naturally.

  • Beambox MRR: 22 customers × $80 × 25% commission ≈ $440/month
  • thMenu MRR: 28 customers × $42 × 20% commission ≈ $235/month (Pro+ weighted)
  • Annual bonuses + tier-up + loyalty (both programs) → roughly $1,625/month layered on top

The bundle pitch shortened average sales cycle from 19 days (Beambox alone) to 12 days, and reduced "WiFi-only" objection handling significantly.

FAQ

Is thMenu enough without Beambox? For small cafes and fast-casual it usually is — single-QR WiFi share + menu covers the basics. For hotels, open-air venues, and campuses where email capture matters, Beambox layers on real value.

Do the commissions conflict? No. Two separate products, two separate programs. You can refer the same client to both (Beambox = network, thMenu = table).

Which industry should lead with which? Hotel / resort / open-air → Beambox first, layer thMenu. QSR / fine dining / food court → thMenu first, WiFi optional.

Found this helpful? Share it.