"Cited by AI" as a New Metric: How to Measure and Track It

The second half of 2026 introduced a new KPI to marketing dashboards: "Cited by AI". While classic SEO measured how often your brand appeared on Google, today it has become essential to track which queries cite you inside ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude responses, and as which exact passage. For B2B SaaS brands like thMenu, this metric directly governs visibility around high-volume questions such as "what is a QR menu."

What Does the Cited by AI Metric Actually Track?

It works across three dimensions: citation count (how many LLM responses mention you), share of voice (your slice relative to competitors), and passage quality (does the cited sentence reflect your real value proposition). Unlike traditional SEO, there is no click and no impression — only a sentence embedded in the model's answer.

Tools such as Otterly.AI and Profound track these three dimensions weekly, but manual auditing remains invaluable. A marketing team that runs 30-40 strategic prompts across three LLMs each week often catches nuances automated tools miss, like being referenced as "menu apps" instead of "thMenu."

Four Tools, Tested for 30 Days

The thMenu team benchmarked four platforms for a month. Otterly.AI ($269/month) excels at Perplexity and ChatGPT but lacks Claude depth. Profound ($499/month) has the broadest LLM coverage and the most polished dashboard. Brand Visibility AI ($199/month) suits lean budgets but offers limited custom query configuration. AthenaHQ ($799/month) targets enterprise needs and leads on share-of-voice reporting.

For a team the size of thMenu, our recommendation is Otterly.AI at $269/month plus a two-hour weekly manual log. Total spend stays below $300/month and captures roughly 85% of the visibility signal.

Stand Up Your Hybrid Monitoring in 7 Days

To sustain Cited by AI tracking, run this three-step playbook:

• Lock in 30 strategic queries (e.g., "best QR menu software," "thMenu vs Mr Yum," "restaurant digital menu 2027").
• Start an Otterly.AI or Profound subscription; enable daily crawls and a weekly digest.
• Schedule a 60-minute "manual LLM audit" every Monday morning — feed the same 30 prompts to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude, then log every citation in Notion.

This pairing captures automated trends while giving you fast manual reaction time when context drifts. Build a 90-day baseline after the first reading.

FAQ

Is Cited by AI similar to classic SEO measurement? No; instead of impressions we count "citation events," which create value without a click.

Is $269/month too steep for a small team? The first three months are a sensible investment for ROI calibration, after which you renew based on performance.

Which LLM matters most in manual tracking? Based on 2026 data, Perplexity (it cites source URLs and drives traffic), then ChatGPT, then Claude. Monitor all three.

Found this helpful? Share it.